On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 08:45 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Roland, I think at one time we were talking about changing the Core to
> > better handle this? Either with attributes/capabilities that the low
> > level driver can set, or by set these method ptrs to NULL and the core
> > should handle it in the wrapper function...
>
> Yes, it would make sense to change the midlayer so we have different
> sets of mandatory functions for IB and iWARP drivers. For example,
> the iwcm functions probably should be mandatory for iWARP devices, right?
>
Yes. The iWARP devices must all support the iwcm methods for sure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
