Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] Provider Methods and Data Structures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 > Roland, I think at one time we were talking about changing the Core to
 > better handle this?  Either with attributes/capabilities that the low
 > level driver can set, or by set these method ptrs to NULL and the core
 > should handle it in the wrapper function...

Yes, it would make sense to change the midlayer so we have different
sets of mandatory functions for IB and iWARP drivers.  For example,
the iwcm functions probably should be mandatory for iWARP devices, right?

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux