On Sun 2006-12-03 23:52:54, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > What exactly is the pita here? Al only came up with some rather
> > > theoretical problems with no practical relevance.
> >
> > Lack of type-checking in timers is ugly.
>
> It's a matter of perspective, a bit more type checking would be nice, but
> breaking the API just for that is ugly as well. Unless there is a bad need
> for it, I don't think it's worth it...
I do not think Al is breaking anything. He's adding that typechecking,
old interface can still stay for a while.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]