On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 09:02 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 03:45:12PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > What's the cruft ?
> >
> > struct bla = container_of(timer, struct bla, timer); ???
>
> That's it, right there. Any idea how much we've bloated the kernel with
> sysfs, just by insisting that the struct device not be the first item in
> the struct? There's any number of 2- and 3- line functions calling each
> other, each adding and subtracting constants from the pointers passed to
> them. This was a huge mistake, IMO.
What a nonsense.
foo->timer.data = foo;
is complete redundant information.
This is going to make a lot of data structures smaller, when the
timer_list is embedded in the structure itself and for the lot, which
ignores the timer callback argument anyway.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
