On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:19:35PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I get the feeling we'd be best off if we were to revisit this in a > > year or so. > > yeah. I'd suggest merging it as-is into v2.6.20. In a year we'll have > some real APIs to think about. Agreed. And because of that I think keeping it in drivers/ for now makes a lot of sense - it's just a driver we can deprecate if/when things have evolved into a real infrastructure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- References:
- [PATCH 0/38] KVM: Decouple Intel VT implementation from base kvm
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/38] KVM: Decouple Intel VT implementation from base kvm
- Prev by Date: Re: CPUFREQ-CPUHOTPLUG: Possible circular locking dependency
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: uli526x only works after reload
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
- Index(es):
 |