On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit
> >of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something you'd rather see?
> >I expect this to be a 24C0 LPC Bridge.
>
> Yes, that's what I'd have asked for. If it works, I expect the device
> code to be different, or both manufacturer and device code to be
> invalid. Depending on the outcome, perhaps we'll need an override
> option so that this test can be partially (i.e. just the device code
> part) or entirely (all the FWH detection) skipped.
> The base problem is the vague documentation of the whole
> detection mechanism - a lot of this I had to read between the lines.
The bug report I referenced came back with this from that debug patch..
intel_rng: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
intel_rng: pci vendor:device 8086:24c0 fwh_dec_en1 80 bios_cntl_val 2 mfc cb dvc 88
intel_rng: FWH not detected
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
