>It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit
>of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something you'd rather see?
>I expect this to be a 24C0 LPC Bridge.
Yes, that's what I'd have asked for. If it works, I expect the device
code to be different, or both manufacturer and device code to be
invalid. Depending on the outcome, perhaps we'll need an override
option so that this test can be partially (i.e. just the device code
part) or entirely (all the FWH detection) skipped.
The base problem is the vague documentation of the whole
detection mechanism - a lot of this I had to read between the lines.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
