On 24/11/06, Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Does the box survive io intensive workloads?
>
> It seems to. It does get sluggish as hell when there is lots of disk I/O but
> it seems to be able to survive.
> I'll try some more, with some IO benchmarks + various other stuff to see
> if I can get it to die that way.
Just wondering if you have a marginal powersupply, perhaps.
It is a possibility, but I doubt it, since if I use a 2.6.17.x kernel
then things are rock solid and I can't cause a lockup even if I leave
my box building kernels in the background for days.
> > Have you tried using net or
> > serial console to see if it spits out any info before it crashes?
>
> Lacking a second box at the moment, so that's not an option currently :(
It's likely a requirement to get any further with this issue, I'm
afraid. Nobody can debug this thing blind folded.
I'll see if I can get my hands on a second box.
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
