On 2006-11-22, Rasmus BЬg Hansen wrote: [] >> Did this like "my server froze. It was entirely dead and had to be power >> cycled."? > > Sorry, I forgot. No it didn't freeze, it is still gladly running as if > nothing happened. If something really bad will happen with nfsd, try to find somebody in MAINTAINERS file to Cc to. ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2)
- From: [email protected] (Rasmus Bøg Hansen)
- smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
- From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
- Re: smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
- From: [email protected] (Rasmus Bøg Hansen)
- Re: smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
- From: [email protected] (Rasmus Bøg Hansen)
- nfs3: possible recursive locking (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
- From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
- Re: nfs3: possible recursive locking (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
- From: [email protected] (Rasmus Bøg Hansen)
- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
- Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/13] BC: context handling
- Previous by thread: Re: nfs3: possible recursive locking (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
- Next by thread: Re: smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
- Index(es):
 |