Re: smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:30:41 +0000 (UTC)
Oleg Verych <[email protected]> wrote:

> [ Adding e-mail of Andrew Morton, he may have clue about who to ping ;]
> [ MAINTAINERS.smbfs seems to be emply                                 ]

smbfs is unmaintained and we'd like to kill it off.  Please use cifs.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
    • From: [email protected] (Rasmus Bøg Hansen)
  • [patch] smbfs: is obsolete, please use CIFS
    • From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>

• References:
  • BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2)
    • From: [email protected] (Rasmus Bøg Hansen)
  • smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
    • From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Error compiling 2.6.19rc[56]
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/6] [RFC] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support V6
• Previous by thread: Re: nfs3: possible recursive locking (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
• Next by thread: [patch] smbfs: is obsolete, please use CIFS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]