Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>]

Quoting Dmitry Mishin (dim@openvz.org):
> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@fr.ibm.com):
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch looks acceptable for us.
> > >
> > > good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below.
> > >
> > > > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a
> > > > reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent
> > > > patchset over his interface.
> > >
> > > yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's more in
> >
> > Where is Andrey's patch?
> This thread - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/42666

Thanks, Dmitry.  Now I do recall seeing that before.

That patchset appears to go part, but not all the way to fitting in with
the existing namespaces.  For instance, you use exit_task_namespaces() for
refcounting, but don't put the net_namespace in the nsproxy and use your
own mechanism for unsharing.

It really seems useful to have all the namespaces be consistent whenever
practical, and I don't think your patchset would need much tweaking to
fit onto Cedric's patch.  Am I missing a complicating factor?

thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/