Quoting Dmitry Mishin ([email protected]):
> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Cedric Le Goater ([email protected]):
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch looks acceptable for us.
> > >
> > > good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below.
> > >
> > > > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a
> > > > reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent
> > > > patchset over his interface.
> > >
> > > yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's more in
> >
> > Where is Andrey's patch?
> This thread - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/42666
Thanks, Dmitry. Now I do recall seeing that before.
That patchset appears to go part, but not all the way to fitting in with
the existing namespaces. For instance, you use exit_task_namespaces() for
refcounting, but don't put the net_namespace in the nsproxy and use your
own mechanism for unsharing.
It really seems useful to have all the namespaces be consistent whenever
practical, and I don't think your patchset would need much tweaking to
fit onto Cedric's patch. Am I missing a complicating factor?
thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
