Quoting Cedric Le Goater ([email protected]):
> Hello,
>
> Dmitry Mishin wrote:
>
> > This patch looks acceptable for us.
>
> good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below.
>
> > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a
> > reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent
> > patchset over his interface.
>
> yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's more in
Where is Andrey's patch?
> the spirit of uts and ipc namespace (and user namespace if that reaches the
> kernel one day :) so that's why i made the small changes.
I agree the namespace frameworks should be consistent, but i don't know
whether Andrey's is or not. I'd like to have the framework included so
we reduce the number of silly rewrites due to clone flag collisions etc.
>
> It also helping the nsproxy/namespace syscalls to have a similar interface
> to manipulate namespaces. who knows, soon we might be able to have a 'struct
> namespace' with a ops field to define new namespace types ?
>
> I can also send a empty framework for user namespace ;)
Please do - then I'll rebase the patchset I sent to the containes list
onto your patch, and resubmit the whole userns.
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
