Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

Kirill Korotaev wrote:

Cedric,

Dmitry Mishin and Daniel Lezcano are working together on the full
network namespace incorporating both needs of OpenVZ and VServer/IBM.

Thanks,
Kirill

Kirill,

We will need this framework to move the network isolation code to thens_proxy/net_namespace structure. So if Cedric gives us a emptyframework it is fine, except if someone does not agree with it...

  -- Daniel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
  - From: Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org>
- Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
  - From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>

References:
- [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
  - From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
- Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
  - From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug: Pentium M not always detected by CPUFREQ
Next by Date: Re: Bug: Pentium M not always detected by CPUFREQ
Previous by thread: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
Next by thread: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]