> no problem here, but I think we will need another one,
> or some smart way to do the network isolation (layer 3)
> for the network namespace (as alternative to the layer 2
> approach) ...
My feeling (Dmitry and Daniel can correct me) is that it will be
addressed with an unshare-like flag : NETNS2 and NETNS3.
> as they are both complementary in some way, I'm not sure
> a single space will suffice ...
hmm, so you think there could be a 2 differents namespaces
for network to handle layer 2 or 3. Couldn't that be just a sub part
of net_namespace.
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
