Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

> no problem here, but I think we will need another one,
> or some smart way to do the network isolation (layer 3)
> for the network namespace (as alternative to the layer 2
> approach) ...

My feeling (Dmitry and Daniel can correct me) is that it will be
addressed with an unshare-like flag : NETNS2 and NETNS3.
 
> as they are both complementary in some way, I'm not sure
> a single space will suffice ...

hmm, so you think there could be a 2 differents namespaces
for network to handle layer 2 or 3. Couldn't that be just a sub part
of net_namespace.

C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• References:
  • [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c(124): remark #593: variable "bootmap_size" was set but nev
• Next by Date: Re: 2007 Linux Storage & Filesystem Workshop
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
• Next by thread: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]