Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

Dmitry Mishin wrote:

This patch looks acceptable for us.
BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a
reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent
patchset over his interface.

I still agree.

Don't blame Cedric, he just wanted to help us. BTW, it is not "his" interface but the namespace interface.

  -- Daniel



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
    • From: Dmitry Mishin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Update Documentation/pci.txt
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/5] e1000 : Make Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
• Next by thread: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]