On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Things may not be quite as bad as they appear. On many architectures the
> > store-mb-load pattern will work as expected. (In fact, I don't know which
> > architectures it might fail on.)
>
> Several weak-memory-ordering CPUs. :-/
Of the CPUs supported by Linux, do you know which ones will work with
store-mb-load and which ones won't?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
