Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:

> My patch is not changing any idle load balancing logic and hence it is no
> less/more aggressive as the current one.

But you cannot do anything in addition to idle balancing. You can only 
draw a process to the cpu you are balancing on. And we are already doing 
that. So this cuts down the frequency of idle balance? And only the first 
idle processor of a group of idle processors does balancing?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] make net/core/skbuff.c:skb_over_panic() static
• Next by Date: Re: [-mm patch] make net/core/skbuff.c:skb_over_panic() static
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]