Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:

> My patch is not changing any idle load balancing logic and hence it is no
> less/more aggressive as the current one.

But you cannot do anything in addition to idle balancing. You can only 
draw a process to the cpu you are balancing on. And we are already doing 
that. So this cuts down the frequency of idle balance? And only the first 
idle processor of a group of idle processors does balancing?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
  - From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
  - From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
  - From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] make net/core/skbuff.c:skb_over_panic() static
Next by Date: Re: [-mm patch] make net/core/skbuff.c:skb_over_panic() static
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
Next by thread: Re: [patch] sched: decrease number of load balances
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]