On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> + if (local_group && balance_cpu != this_cpu && balance) {
^^^^^
This would need to be *balance right? balance is always != 0.
> + *balance = 0;
> + goto ret;
> + }
How well was this patch tested?
We already have idle processors pulling processes from elsewhere in the
system. Load balancing on an idle processor could only replicate the
balance on idle logic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
