Andrew Morton wrote:
I'd suggest that you send what you believe to be the correct change and see if you can preempt the usual objections via the changelog.
OK, I'll review this and start resubmitting when my current backlog of work clears. I'm not really sure how to preempt objections with the changelog. The objections seemed to be against the fundemental mechanism of the patch. -- Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Daniel Barkalow <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- References:
- linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Toralf Förster <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the frame diverter
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions with patches
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed
- Index(es):
 |