Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls

David Brownell wrote:

- gpio_set_value() ... implementations can lock internally, as needed.
  ditto gpio_get_value(), but only bizarre hardware would need it.

"bizarre" ~= "ppc", at least. But I'd hardly argue with that characterization most days. :)

b.g.

--
Bill Gatliff
[email protected]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: "Thiago Galesi" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: laptop (Quanta) does not power off
• Next by Date: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3)
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
• Next by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]