OK.
Sorry.
I had to attach the patch, since hotmail does line wrapping, but I will note
the part regarding
the more descriptive subject.
Also, some of the patches are one line per file, so I joined them together
in one single patch.
I thought that splitting that into many tiny patches will actually be more
annoying than
a single bigger patch.
Does that mean I should send those patches again?
From: Russell King <[email protected]>
To: Burman Yan <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATH] Replace kmalloc+memset with kzalloc 1/17
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:31:03 +0000
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:20:53PM +0200, Burman Yan wrote:
> This is the first part of the patches I made that do trivial change of
> replacing
> kmalloc and memset with kzalloc
Please follow the guidelines in SubmittingPatches in the kernel source
when sending patches out. You must not expect everyone here to read
each of the attachments in your messages in detail to work out whether
they need to do something with it or not.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
