On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:22:52 +0300
Al Boldi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > The problem is not just simple bugs that surface, it's deeper than that.
> > > Deep structural problems is what plagues 2.6.
> > >
> > > Only a focused model may deal with such problems.
> >
> > can you at least provide a list of such structural problems?
> > In fact, why don't you collect them and mail them out (bi)weekly... that
> > may already do wonders.
> > Look at what Adrian is doing with the regressions; although the response
> > isn't 100% people DO pay attention to it.... so maybe if you post a
> > "structural problems list" people will actually start working on
> > things.. (and of course you can help too ;)
>
> Ok, things like OOM, scheduling, and block-io.
If you want stability don't change these. But if you think you
have better heuristics propose them for discussion.
>
> net looks ok, although I would suggest a redesign for 3.0.
Facts, no vague pronouncements please.
--
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
