> So Roland is correct in his comment about how ioremap is called. Umm, so is this patch really needed? Where did the patch come from -- is it needed to fix something actually seen, or was it written just based on some theoretical understanding? I'm confused... - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode
- From: Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com>
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode
- From: Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode
- Prev by Date: Re: Strange write errors on FAT32 partition (maybe an FAT32 bug?!)
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.19-rc5-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode
- Next by thread: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode
- Index(es):
 |