Re: [PATCH 32/33] x86_64: Relocatable kernel support

On 8/1/06, Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> wrote:

I guess I could take this in some slightly smaller steps.
But this does wind up with decompressor being 64bit code.

Sorry to bring out the old mail.

except reusing the uncompressor in 32bit, is there any reason that you
removed startup_32 for vmlinux but keep startup_32 for bzImage?

that will make vmlinux use 64bit boot loader only.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 32/33] x86_64: Relocatable kernel support
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] corrupted cramfs filesystems cause kernel oops
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 32/33] x86_64: Relocatable kernel support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]