Paul M wrote:
> That can negatively affect the
> performance of other tasks, which is what we're trying to prevent.
That sounds like a worthwhile goal. I agree that zone_reclaim
doesn't do that.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Memory Controller
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2]: Use newly defined PCI channel offline routine
- Next by Date: Re: [KJ][PATCH] Correct misc_register return code handling in several drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
- Index(es):
 |