Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller

On 10/31/06, Balbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:


I thought this would be hard to do in general, but with a page -->
container mapping that will come as a result of the memory controller,
will it still be that hard?


I meant that it's pretty much impossible with the current APIs
provided by the kernel. That's why one of the most useful things that
a memory controller can provide is accounting and limiting of page
cache usage.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- RFC: Memory Controller
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Memory Controller
  - From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
  - From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
  - From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
Next by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH] dont insert sockets/pipes dentries into dentry_hashtable.
Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]