On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:05:49 +0100 Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 01/11/06, Neil Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hey all-
> > Since Andrew hasn't incorporated this patch yet, and I had the time, I
> > redid the patch taking Benjamin's INIT_LIST_HEAD and Joes mmtimer cleanup into
> > account. New patch attached, replacing the old one, everything except the
> > aforementioned cleanups is identical.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Neil
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
> >
> > +out4:
> > + for_each_online_node(node) {
> > + kfree(timers[node]);
> > + }
> > +out3:
> > + misc_deregister(&mmtimer_miscdev);
> > +out2:
> > + free_irq(SGI_MMTIMER_VECTOR, NULL);
> > +out1:
> > + return -1;
>
> Very nitpicky little thing, but shouldn't the labels start at column
> 1, not column 0 ?
> I thought that was standard practice (apparently labels at column 0
> can confuse 'patch').
>
> Hmm, I guess that should be defined once and for all in
> Documentation/CodingStyle
I have some other CodingStyle changes to submit, but feel free
to write this one up.
However, I didn't know that we had a known style for this, other
than "not indented so far that it's hidden".
If a label in column 0 [0-based :] confuses patch, then that's
a reason, I suppose. I wasn't aware of that one...
In a case like that, we usually say "fix the tool then."
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
