"Holden Karau" <[email protected]> writes: > This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not > necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all > that]. Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT. And the your patch didn't make performance better, right? -- OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- From: "Holden Karau" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- References:
- [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- From: Holden Karau <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- From: "Holden Karau" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- From: "Holden Karau" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node()
- Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] net/tipc/port.c: fix NULL dereference
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
- Index(es):
 |