Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised

Holden Karau <[email protected]> writes:

> From: Holden Karau <[email protected]> http://www.holdenkarau.com
> This is an attempt at improving fat_mirror_bhs in sync mode [namely it
> writes all of the data for a backup block, and then blocks untill
> finished]. The old behavior would write & block in smaller chunks, so
> this should be slightly faster. It also removes the fix me requesting
> that it be fixed to behave this way :-)

Please post the result of performance test.  If it's fairly big, we
would be able to use async for mirror FAT. Instead, for hotplug device
we can provide the another option.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
    • From: "Holden Karau" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
    • From: Holden Karau <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
• Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]