Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:14:32AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
But I've become innoculated against warnings, just because we have too
many of the totally useless noise about deprecation and crud, and ppc has
it's own set of bogus compiler-and-linker-generated warnings..
At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just
because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones.
Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the
uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ?
Why not apply pressure to gcc people to fix their compiler warning bugs
instead?
I did. They didn't. Reality is a bitch.
To be fair, it says "variable *may* be uninitialised", which is correct,
in that it's not able to follow through functions. likely / unlikely
also broke it, but they fixed that in 4.2.x
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
