On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:14:32AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >But I've become innoculated against warnings, just because we have too
> >many of the totally useless noise about deprecation and crud, and ppc has
> >it's own set of bogus compiler-and-linker-generated warnings..
> >
> >At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just
> >because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones.
>
> Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the
> uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ?
Why not apply pressure to gcc people to fix their compiler warning bugs
instead?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
