Re: [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



vatsa wrote:
> C. Paul Menage's container patches
> 
> 	Provides a generic heirarchial ...
> 
> Consensus/Debated Points
> ------------------------
> 
> Consensus:
> 	...
> 	- Dont support heirarchy for now

Looks like this item can be dropped from the concensus ... ;).

I for one would recommend getting the hierarchy right from the
beginning.

Though I can appreciate that others were trying to "keep it simple"
and postpone dealing with such complications.  I don't agree.

Such stuff as this deeply affects all that sits on it.  Get the
basic data shape presented by the kernel-user API right up front.
The rest will follow, much easier.

Good review of the choices - thanks.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux