Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq

On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:44:36PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> revised version according to Eric. and it can be applied clearly to
> current Linus's Tree.
> 
> Clear the irq releated entries in irq_vector, irq_domain and vector_irq
> instead of clearing irq_vector only. So when new irq is created, it
> could reuse that vector. (actually is the second loop scanning from
> FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR+8). This could avoid the vectors are used up
> with enough module inserting and removing

Added thanks.

Does i386 need a similar patch?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

References:
- RE: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
  - From: "Lu, Yinghai" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
  - From: "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [RFC] kswapd: Kernel Swapper performance
Next by Date: Re: usb initialization order (usbhid vs. appletouch)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]