RE: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq

["Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@amd.com>]

Thanks.

I only found ht_irq and msi call destroy_irq. How about io_apic? 

YH

-----Original Message-----
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:muli@il.ibm.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:30 AM
To: Lu, Yinghai
Cc: Andi Kleen; Eric W. Biederman; Andrew Morton; Linux Kernel Mailing
List
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear
irq_vector for destroy_irq

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:46:31PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> resend with gmail.
> 
> Clear the irq releated entries in irq_vector, irq_domain and
vector_irq
> instead of clearing irq_vector only. So when new irq is created, it
> could reuse that vector. (actually is the second loop scanning from
> FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR+8). This could avoid the vectors are used up
> with enough module inserting and removing
> 
> Cc: Eric W. Biedierman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Signed-off-By: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@amd.com>

I hope I'm testing the right patch... this one boots and works fine.

Cheers,
Muli




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/