On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:06:36AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> IIRC, I avoided list.h because I only wanted a singly linked list (it
> never gets traversed backwards). List.h looks to me like all doubly
> linked lists. Do you know if there are any other singly linked list
> implementations I could piggy-back?
>
> That said, since there's normally not that many extents, I could switch
> quite easily and it wouldn't normally waste much memory.
If the overhead doesn't matter for you (and I doubt it does) I'd say just
use list.h. Reusing existing code that doesn't need to be debugged and
is idiomatically readable to everyone is very helpfull.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
