Hi.
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 23:47 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:06:36AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > IIRC, I avoided list.h because I only wanted a singly linked list (it
> > never gets traversed backwards). List.h looks to me like all doubly
> > linked lists. Do you know if there are any other singly linked list
> > implementations I could piggy-back?
> >
> > That said, since there's normally not that many extents, I could switch
> > quite easily and it wouldn't normally waste much memory.
>
> If the overhead doesn't matter for you (and I doubt it does) I'd say just
> use list.h. Reusing existing code that doesn't need to be debugged and
> is idiomatically readable to everyone is very helpfull.
Ok.
Regards,
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
