Re: [KJ] [PATCH] Correct misc_register return code handling in several drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 07:24:37AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:53:06AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > The INIT_LIST_HEAD is there to prevent a potential oops on module removal.
> > misc_register, if it fails, leaves miscdevice.list unchanged.  That means its
> > next and prev pointers contain NULL or garbage, when both pointers should contain
> > &miscdevice.list. If we don't do that, then there is a chance we will oops on
> > module removal when we do a list_del in misc_deregister on the moudule_exit
> > routine.  I could have done this statically, but I thought it looked cleaner to
> > do it with the macro in the code.
> 
> Maybe it would be better to have misc_register() call INIT_LIST_HEAD in
> the failure case?

Hmm, that seems reasonable.  If you don't mind, since there are other unrelated
clean-ups in this patch, I'll make that change in a follow on patch.  But I
think thats a good idea.

Thanks & Regards
Neil

-- 
/***************************************************
 *Neil Horman
 *Software Engineer
 *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 - http://pgp.mit.edu
 ***************************************************/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux