Holden Karau wrote:
I've changed the patch based on your suggestions :-)
Thanks, looks fine. Let's just wait for an OK from Ulrich, then you can send it to John, without broken tabs/lines, with signoff and description.
Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11
- From: Uli Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>
- Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11
- References:
- [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11
- From: "Holden Karau" <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
- Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11
- From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
- Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11
- From: "Holden Karau" <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
- [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc2: known unfixed regressions (v3)
- Next by Date: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] Correct misc_register return code handling in several drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] wireless-2.6 zd1211rw check against regulatory domain rather than hardcoded value of 11
- Index(es):
 |