Avi Kivity <[email protected]> writes: > Dropping 32-bit host support would certainly kill a lot of #ifdefs and > reduce the amount of testing needed. Sounds like a good thing. > It would also force me to upgrade my home machine. Why? AFAIK there are no VT machines that don't support EM64T. If you mean you have 32bit userland you can certainly use a 64bit kernel with 32bit userland. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- References:
- [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- Prev by Date: Re: make pdfdocs broken in 2.6.19rc2 and needs fixes
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Char: mxsers, correct tty driver name
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- Index(es):
 |