On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 07:01:29PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >What is the point of 32 bit hosts anyway? Isn't this only available > >on x86_64 type CPUs in the first place? > > > > No, 32-bit hosts are fully supported (except a 32-bit host can't run a > 32-bit guest). Again, what's the point? All cpus shipped by Intel and AMD that have hardware virtualization extensions also support the 64bit mode. Given that I don't see any point for supporting a 32bit host. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Anthony Liguori <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- References:
- [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: using cpu_online_map instead of APIC_ALL_CPUS
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- Index(es):