On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Yes, we have lots of header include indirection going on. > I don't know of a good tool to detect/fix it. BTW, what about making sure all header files are self-contained (i.e. all header files include all stuff they need)? This would make it easier for the users to know which files to include. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- References:
- [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- dealing with excessive includes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: using cpu_online_map instead of APIC_ALL_CPUS
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
- Previous by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
- Next by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
- Index(es):