On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 01:25:32PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
> > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700
> >
> > > Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any
> > > differently than out-of-tree other code.
> >
> > I think what netdump was trying to do, provide a way to
> > requeue instead of fully drop the SKB, is quite reasonable.
> > Don't you think?
>
>
> Netdump doesn't even exist in the current Fedora source rpm.
> I think Dave dropped it.
Indeed. Practically no-one cared about it, so it bit-rotted
really fast after we shipped RHEL4. That, along with the focus
shifting to making kdump work seemed to kill it off over the last
12 months.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
