On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:18:57 -0700
>
> > Netdump is not in the tree, so I can't fix it. Also netdump is pretty
> > much superseded by kdump.
>
> Unless kdump is %100 ready you can be sure vendors will ship netdump
> for a little while longer. I think gratuitously breaking netdump is
> not the best idea.
>
> It's not like netdump is some binary blob you can't get the source
> to easily. :-)
>
Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any differently
than out-of-tree other code.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
