That's just a dead weight these days --- include/asm-x86_64/uaccess.h | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/uaccess.h b/include/asm-x86_64/uaccess.h index 19f9917..d5dbc87 100644 --- a/include/asm-x86_64/uaccess.h +++ b/include/asm-x86_64/uaccess.h @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ #define __X86_64_UACCESS_H */ #include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/errno.h> -#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/prefetch.h> #include <asm/page.h> -- 1.4.2.GIT - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- References:
- Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- dealing with excessive includes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] sysrq-t broke and no one noticed
- Next by Date: Re: kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at linux-2.6.git/mm/slab.c:3177!
- Previous by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
- Next by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
- Index(es):
 |