Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree

> You just mean the if statement above though? I was talking more about
> the structure above this called "clocksource_pit" which isn't used on
> SMP systems due to this code addition. AFAIK init_pit_clocksource()
> could disappear along with the clocksource structure ..

It will end up as a int f() { return 0; }. Not very much overhead. 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6 patch] fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:fill_super_meta(): fix NULL dereference
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/1] Char: mxsers, correct tty driver name
Previous by thread: Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree
Next by thread: Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]