Re: + i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups.patch added to -mm tree

[Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>]

On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 15:47 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 19 October 2006 15:44, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 14:26 -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> > 
> > > diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c~i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
> > > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c~i386-time-avoid-pit-smp-lockups
> > > +++ a/arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
> > > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_pi
> > >  
> > >  static int __init init_pit_clocksource(void)
> > >  {
> > > -	if (num_possible_cpus() > 4) /* PIT does not scale! */
> > > +	if (num_possible_cpus() > 1) /* PIT does not scale! */
> > >  		return 0;
> > >  
> > 
> > Can we ifdef some code here on CONFIG_SMP . It bugs me that there just
> > dead code laying around on smp systems.
> 
> The optimizer should optimize it all out since num_possible_cpus() is a 0
> constant on UP.

You just mean the if statement above though? I was talking more about
the structure above this called "clocksource_pit" which isn't used on
SMP systems due to this code addition. AFAIK init_pit_clocksource()
could disappear along with the clocksource structure ..

Daniel 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/