pj, responding to Nick:
> > But please don't let *users* try to deal with it.
>
> Agreed - that's why I am about to send a patch that removes
> the sched domain side affects of the cpu_exclusive flag.
And Andrew has already pulled this "explicit dynamid sched
domain control flag" patch, at my request.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- Prev by Date: Re: exclusive cpusets broken with cpu hotplug
- Next by Date: Re: exclusive cpusets broken with cpu hotplug
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
- Index(es):
 |