Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Jackson wrote:
Nick wrote:

You don't have to worry about the details of the hierarchy. You just need
to know where the partitions are


Cpusets is a hierarchical space.  What happens in a subtree
of the /dev/cpuset hierarchy should not be affecting others.

Partitioning sched domains is a flat space - dividing the
CPUs of a system into disjoint partitions.

Using details deep in the cpuset hierarchy to define global
partitions leads to chaos in the minds of those coming at
this from the cpuset side.

So don't do it, then. Just do the partitioning for disjoint
cpusets off the root cpuset, if you like. Or don't use it at
all, even.

But please don't let *users* try to deal with it.

The lack of any means on a production system to view the
resulting partition leads to ignorance of how deep is the
chaos, a dangerous state of affairs.

It is much less complex than cpusets, as you note it is a flat
space.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux