Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device

Jesse Brandeburg wrote:

Is this patch going to go upstream?  I've been testing 2.6.18 on a
couple different systems and seen the same issue.  I haven't tested
the patch yet.


The patch is pending review.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13408/focus=13439

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
  - From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
  - From: "Joe Jin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
  - From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
  - From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
  - From: "Jesse Brandeburg" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt6 sysctl conflict
Next by Date: [S390] Wire up epoll_pwait syscall.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
Next by thread: [PATCH] kernel-doc: drop __must_check and various "inline" qualifiers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]