Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt6 sysctl conflict

Joe Korty <[email protected]> writes:

> Repair conflict between 2.6.18 and preempt-rt's sysctl(2) addition.

In general new sysctl shouldn't get any numbers at all. Just use 0
or so or 999. Distributions and other patches have mangled the 
numerical name so excessively that it is fairly useless for
any newer numbers. I would suggest to just drop them.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt6 sysctl conflict
    • From: Joe Korty <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCHv2] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt6 sysctl conflict
• Next by thread: Re: SpeedTouch Disconnections
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]